Maramreddy Amarnath Reddy, (A10) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/5824/2025 · 2025-07-02
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20030 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20030 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY``'`- CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5824 OF 2025 Betwee n : Maramreddy Amarnath Reddy, (A10), S/o Venkata Sesha Reddy, Aged about 58 years, R/o 6-8-13, Agrahara Peta, L.ASagaram, Naidupeta, Tirupati District Petitioner/Accused AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, rep. by Its Public Prosecutor, Hl-gh Court of A.P, Amaravati. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 482 h of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal petition, the Hl'gh Court may be pleased to direct release of the petitioner on Bail in the event of his arrest pursuant to the registration of FIR.No. 76/2025 Dated 18.05.2025 of Chillakur PS, Tirupati District. lANO: 1 OF2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR.No. 76/2025 Dated 18.05.2025 of Chillakur PS, Tirupati District, Pending disposal of CRL~P 5824 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. I The petition/Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T NAGARJUNA REDDY Advocate for the Petitioner, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) for the Respondent and the Court made the following. APHCOI O280832025 ELF [N THE HIGH CAOTUAF:A?RFAAvNADTTRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY _CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5824/2025_ Between : MaramreddyAmarnath Reddy, (a10) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh H.RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Coult Made the Following Order:- The Criminal PetI'tiOn, under Section 482 of the BNSS,I is filed on behalf of the petitioner hereinto grant anticipatory bail in connection with Grim.e No.76 of 2025 of Chilakur Police Station, Tirupathi District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1),189(2) and 191(3) reacl with 190 BNS. 2'.
Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 18.05.2025, the defacto complainant filed a report before the police stating that while
Li- \ he was going {o his village by his two-wheeler, after crossing BaIIavolu village near a culvert, he noticed two minor boys from Edalavaripalem village, who complained that a group of persons had taken their traps and bikes and were refusing to return them. When the defacto complainan{ approached the group and requested them to return the traps and bikes, all the accused formed themselves into unlawful assembly, abused him in filthy language and questioned his authority by stating that they were waiting to kill him due to previous disputes and all the accused armed with sticks and rods surrounded the defacto complainant and attacked him indiscriminately and caused bleeding head injury and multiple blunt injuries all over the body. 3. Heard. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel forthe petitioner submits that basing on the confessional statement of the co-accused, name of the petitioner herein is arrayed as accused at a belated stage. He further submits that the confessional statement is not admissible evidence and the defacto complainant was treated as an outpatient in the hospital and was discharged from the hospital. 5. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. ln view of the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view of the fact tha,I thelpetitioner herein is arrayed as accused basing on the confessional statement of t'he co-accused,
this Court is inclined to consider the request of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail, however, on conditions. 7.
Accordingly, in the event of his arrest in the above said crime, the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond i;r a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and also on condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, once in a week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM, till filing of the charge sheet. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, jn the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. i SD/- M.SRINIVAS ASSIST RIEG IS TEAR _ - //TRUE COPY// 't.._ -,_i;t.; For| SECTIO:faR:iGEf: To,
1. The Station House Officer, ChiI`Iakur Police Station, Tirupati District. 2. One CC to SRI. T NAGARJUNA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court ofA.P., Amaravati [OUT]. 4. One spare copy
\. HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :03/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5824 of 2025 ALLOWED