SUDHIR KUMAR VERMA AND 18 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/11893/2025 · 2025-10-13
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200295 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11893 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking following relief(s):- (i) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding/directing the opposite parties to fix the seniority of the petitioners since the date of their appointment and treating the petitioners' continuity in their service, from their initial date of appointment i.e. July- August, 2019 for all the purposes and also provide all consequential service benefits forthwith. ..."
3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.4 i.e., The Director General, Uttar Pradesh Fire & Emergency Services, U.P. who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 13, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Mani Tripathi, Puneet Kumar Tiwari, Veerendra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sudhir Kumar Verma And 18 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench