HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12003 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rajan Tripathi, who appears for the respondent. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the order impugned is a revisable order. 3. No case under Article 227 of the Constitution of India lies. 4. The writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. 5. Office to return back the certified copy of the order impugned to the learned counsel for the petitioner within 48 hours after retaining a photocopy of the same. October 14, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Sharma, Nitesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rajan Tripathi (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Savita Seth .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Purnima Tripathi .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad