HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34302 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Imtiyaj Ali, counsel for the informant and Mr. V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-respondent. 2. The present bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 191 of 2025, under Sections 107 BNS, Police Station Zamania, District Ghazipur during the pendency of trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. According to the postmortem report, the cause of death is asphyxia as a result of ante mortem drowning. As per the allegations, the essential ingredients to constitute the offence under Section 107 B.N.S. are not made out. The applicant, in no manner, abetted the commission of suicide by the deceased. The applicant is in jail since 01.08.2025 having no criminal history and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned AGA and the counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that the necessary ingredients to constitute the offence under Section 107 B.N.S. are not made out. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Further, the applicant has remained confined for more Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naushad Alam, Shashi Kant Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Asheesh Kumar, G.A., Imtiyaj Ali Sunil Bind .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) than two months and after submission of charge sheet there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or delay the trial or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant Sunil Bind, involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he: (i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court; (ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; and, (iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. October 14, 2025 Lbm/- BAIL No. 34302 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad