Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200245 (ALL)

RAM VILAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/7499/2025 · 2025-10-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7499 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.184 of 2024, under Section 304 IPC, P.S. Ataria, District Sitapur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 30.6.2024, all the accused named in the FIR called the husband of the informant and subsequently all of them beaten him which resulted in his death. In the light of the said learned counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the report of the medico legal cell, which was of the opinion that for the nature of injuries sustained by the deceased the same can be caused by sudden fall on hard ground. No recovery was effected from the applicant. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the aforesaid medico legal cell report as well as the statement of the medical officer which is on record as annexure 7, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is aged about 46 years and has a criminal history of one case of minor offence is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ram Vilas be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrit Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Divya Singh, Rohit Kumar Tripathi Ram Vilas .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7499 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench