MAHARAJ SINGH v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS
A227/12267/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12267 of 2025 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant petition.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. October 14, 2025 Shafique Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Bhaskar, Reeta Rani, Udai Singhal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Maharaj Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad