SURENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1485/2025 · 2025-10-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200236 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200236 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1485 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.171 of 2025, under Sections 323, 376, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged by the informant aged about 40 years through an application under Section 175(3) of BNSS that the co- accused Neeraj Singh had enticed her and physical relations were formed on the false pretext of marriage. The allegation of beating was also made. No allegation of offence under Section 376 IPC was levelled against the applicant.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. As the FIR does not disclosed any offence against the applicant under Section 376 IPC and the fact that the applicant is aged about 61 years, the applicant is entitled for the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Surendra Singh be released on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Singh, Ashish Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Surendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bonds to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. October 13, 2025 akverma NABAIL No. 1485 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench