Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20023 (KAR)

THE MANAGER v. SRI ULLAS D

MFA/5101/2019 · 2025-04-21

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16460 MFA No. 5101 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5101 OF 2019 (MV-I) BETWEEN: THE MANAGER SRIRAM GENERAL INS. CO. LTD., MONARCH CHAMBER, INFANTRY ROAD, SHIVAJI NAGAR BANGALORE. NOW REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER SHRIRAM GENERAL INS. CO. LTD., NO.3/5, III FLOOR, S.V. ARCADE, BILAKALLI MAIN ROAD, OFF: B.G. ROAD, IIM POST, BENGALURU 560 076 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. A.N.KRISHNA SWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI ULLAS D., S/O DINESH K., AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS R/AT : NO.126, 17TH MAIN, BTM 2ND STAGE, 08-2017, BANNRGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE SOUTH -560 076 2. MR. NAVEEN C.S S/O SANNE GOWDA CHIKKALALE, K.R. PET TLAUK, MANDYA -571 401 …RESPONDENTS (R1 & R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:26/03/2019, PASSED IN MVC NO.3908/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL SMALL Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16460 MFA No. 5101 of 2019 CAUSES JUDGE AND XXXIV ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, MACT-7, BENGALURU, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.6,53,828/- ALONG WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6 PERCENT P.A., (EXCLUDING ON FUTURE MEDICAL EXPENSES OF RS.20,000/-) FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALIZATION OF ENTIRE AMOUNT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the award passed in MVC.No.3908/2017 dated 26.03.2019 by IX Addl. Small Causes Judge and XXXIV ACMM, Court of Small Causes, Member, MACT-7, Bangalore. The present appeal is filed by the appellant/Insurance Company questioning the liability fastened on them. 2. It is the case of the claimant that on 14.05.2017 at about 5:30 p.m., the claimant was proceeding in Splendor Plus bike as a pillion rider, ridden by its rider slowly and cautiously on the left side of the road from Kanakapura towards Bangalore, when they reached near Gantagandoddi gate, the driver of the TATA Ace drove the same in high speed, rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motorcycle and due to the impact he fell down and sustained severe injuries to his legs, hands and to all over the body. Immediately, after the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16460 MFA No. 5101 of 2019 accident he was shifted to Sai Ram Hospital and later shifted to Jayadeva Hospital for treatment wherein he was treated as an inpatient and during the period of treatment he was operated for the injuries. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/ Insurance Company submits that the driver of the offending vehicle is not having a valid driving license. In fact, the crime is registered under Section 3(1) R/w 181 and 192(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, stating that there was no driving license. In spite of the same, the Tribunal had fixed the liability on the Insurance Company. 4. There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.2/owner of the offending vehicle. 5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1/ claimant submits that the Tribunal had rightly considered and held that the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation. 6. Having heard the counsels on either side, perused the material on record. The crime is registered under Section 3(1) R/w 181 and 192(a) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:16460 MFA No. 5101 of 2019 shows that the driver of the offending vehicle is not having the valid driving license. In the light of the law laid down in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Swaran Singh and others1 as the driver is not having the driving license, the principle of pay and recover will apply and the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. 7. Accordingly, the appeal of the appellant/Insurance Company is partly allowed and the insurance company shall pay the compensation amount and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. i. The amount in deposit shall be forthwith transmitted to the Tribunal. ii. The appellant/Insurance company shall pay the amount and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. iii. The apportionment of the amount shall be as per the order passed by the Tribunal. iv. The appellant/Insurance Company shall deposit the remaining amount, if any, within a period of eight 1 AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT 1531 - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:16460 MFA No. 5101 of 2019 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. On such deposit, the claimant is entitled to withdraw the entire amount without furnishing any security. v. Registry is directed to return the Trial Court Records to the Tribunal, along with certified copy of the order passed by this Court forthwith without any delay. vi. No costs. vii. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 52