VIRENDER SINGH v. TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED TRIFED & ANR.
W.P.(C)/7485/2025 · 2025-05-27
Prateek Jalan
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20023 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20023 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 7485/2025 $~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7485/2025 VIRENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivendra Singh, Advocate. versus TRIBAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING DEVELOPMENT FEDERATION OF INDIA LIMITED TRIFED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R %
29.08.2025 REVIEW PET. 450/2025 & CM APPL. 54062/2025 (for condonation of delay)
1. By way of the present review petition, the petitioner seeks review of an order dated 27.05.2025, by which the captioned writ petition was
disposed of, relegating him to alternative remedies under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 [“CCS (CCA) Rules”].
2. The aforesaid order was passed based on the submission of Mr. Shivendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, that such remedies are available. In the review petition, it is submitted that this contention was erroneous and that no further remedy is available under the CCS (CCA) Rules.
3. The matter was passed over to enable Mr. Sumit Teterwal, learned This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/09/2025 at 12:25:32
W.P.(C) 7485/2025 counsel for respondent No. 1, and Mr. Singh to take instructions on whether the powers of revision or review, conferred by Rule 29 and Rule 29-A of the CCS (CCA) Rules are available in the present case.
4. Mr. Teterwal submits that the order under review was, in fact, passed on a correct submission and that a revision under Rule 29 of the CCS (CCA) Rules would be maintainable.
5. In view of this submission made on behalf of respondent No. 1, Mr. Singh does not press the review petition.
6. The review petition, alongwith pending application, is accordingly
disposed of.
PRATEEK JALAN, J AUGUST 29, 2025
“Bhupi/KA”/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/09/2025 at 12:25:32