Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010280672019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12844/2019 Between: P.Vijaya Babu, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A V V S BHUJANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
2. REVANURU SUDHA RANI (SC FOR SAMAGRA SHIKSHA)
3. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not allowing the amendment to the applications submitted by the Petitioners and considering their earlier experience in NGOs and awarding weightage marks for the same as per the rule issued in G.O.Ms.No.24 dt.15.02.2019 as amended in G.O.Ms.No.31 dt.06.05.2019 as arbitrary and illegal and further declare that they are entitled to weightage marks as per the amended rules issued in G.O.Ms.No.31 dt.06.05.2019.”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioners today.
2
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 12844 of 2019
16.04.2025
Mjl /*