Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20021 (KAR)

SRI. N J PAUL v. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER

WP/969/2021 · 2025-01-09

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:830 WP No. 969 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 969 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. N.J.PAUL S/O. SRI. R.S.NATHAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, 5TH 'B' CROSS, SRI. M.V.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.MANJUNATHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR POLICE STATION, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 016. 2. THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY CUM POLICE INSPECTOR, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR POLICE STATION, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 016. 3. KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY S.L.PATIL., 'MAHITI SOUDHA', NO. 203, 2ND FLOOR, DEVARAJA URS ROAD, OPP. TO VIKASASOUDHA, WEST FACE-2, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:830 WP No. 969 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for the respondents has appeared in person. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:830 WP No. 969 of 2021 for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16