Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20021 (JHR)

SANU PRIYA v. JAI RAMAN ROY

Tr.Pet.CVL/64/2024 · 2025-02-10

Rajesh Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition (C) No.64 of 2024 ---- Sanu Priya, aged about 34 years, wife of Jai Raman Roy and daughter of Divakant Pathak, Resident of Ward No.12, Babu Pada, Godda, P.O.-Godda, P.S.-Godda Town, District-Godda, Jharkhand. Presently residing at Quarter No.12F/D2203, Bokaro Steel City, Laxmi Narayan Appartment, A Block Fat No.19, Chira Chas Chankya Puri P.S.-Chas, Dist-Bokaro. …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus Jai Raman Roy , aged about 38 years, Son of Late Mani Kant Roy, M/o-Anita Devi, R/o-Quarter No.12F D2203, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro and Resident of Flat No.S-23 Suryadya Apartment, Chira Chas, P.O. + P.S. – Chas, District – Bokaro. Presently residing at Suryadya Apartment, Chira Chas, P.O. + P.S. – Chas, Dist.- Bokaro, Jharkhand. …. …. Opposite Party(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Kr. Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Sahil, Adv. ---- 06/Dated: 10th February, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/wife and learned counsel for the opposite party/husband. 2. In spite of time granted by this Court to the learned counsel for the husband no counter affidavit has been filed by the husband. Today also, adjournment has been sought. 3. The present transfer petition has been filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code for transfer of Original Case No.260 of 2023 from the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Godda. 4. It appears that the parties are related by marriage which has been held in the year 2018. There is no child out of the wedlock. 5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the wife has been humiliated and harassed and for that a criminal case has been lodged at Godda district and as a counter blast the present original case under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed. Further, the wife has every apprehension and as such she wants this original case no.260 of 2023 be transferred to the Family Court, Godda. 6. Learned counsel for the O.P./husband has opposed the submission of the petitioner and it has been submitted that the wife is a teacher in Bokaro itself and this Page | 2 Tr. Petition (Cvl) No.64 of 2024 fact has been disputed by the learned counsel for the wife saying that now she is not working in the said college. 7. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the Original Case No.260 of 2023, is hereby, transferred to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Godda. 8. The present transfer petition stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Amar/- Uploaded