Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200192 (ALL)

KOMAL PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

TACR/122/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 122 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Vikash Chauhan, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Shatruhan Yadav, learned AGA for the State are present. 2. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to transfer the proceedings of Session Trial No. 743 of 2004, arising out of Case Crime No. 796 of 2002, under Section 307 IPC, Police Station Chandausi, District Sambhal pending in the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge Chandausi, Sambhal to other competent court adjacent to District Sambhal. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant submits, applicant is complainant of the case and he filed instant transfer application to transfer the case from District Sambhal to any other adjacent district but applicant is ready to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing and therefore instant application may be disposed off with the direction that if applicant filed an application before appropriate forum to appear through Video Conferencing then his application shall be entertained and he will be permitted to appear through Video Conferencing. 4. Learned AGA is having no objection. 5. The instant transfer application has been filed by the applicant, who is complaint of the case to transfer the proceedings of the case from District Sambhal to any adjacent district but now he is ready to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing, therefore, instant transfer application is being disposed off with a direction that if applicant filed an application to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing then his application shall be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Komal Prakash .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) considered and he will be permitted to pursue the matter through Video Conferencing. 6. Stay order, if any, shall stands vacated. October 14, 2025 AK Pandey TACR No. 122 of 2025 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad