HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34315 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Pulak Ganguly, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 1.4.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9437 of 2025. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.501 of 2024, under Sections 69, 351(3) B.N.S. and Section 67 I.T. Act, Police Station Meja, District Prayagraj with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant could not produce any new ground for pressing the instant bail application, as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The instant bail application is accordingly rejected. 6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously as early as possible in view of the principle as has been laid down in the recent judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 and Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pulak Ganguly Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish Kumar Maurya Alias Manish Kumar Kushwaha .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 14, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 34315 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad