RICHA KUMARI D/O RAKESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/8150/2025 · 2025-08-26
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20017 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 20017 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33908] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8150/2025 Richa Kumari D/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village And Post Sihi, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Registrar, Dr. Sarvpalli Radhakrishanan Rajasthan Ayhurved University, Kadvad, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur
3. Chairman, Counseling Board, Ayush Bhawan, Room No. 107-212-214, Sector 26, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur-302033
4. Principal, Govt. Yog And Naturopathy Medical College, Shri Sant Sundardas Seva Sansthan Trust Building, Tuhiya Road, Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ambrish Vashishtha For Respondent(s) : Ms. Megha Sharma for Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma Mr. Vishesh Sharma Mr. Shubhanshu Pilania for Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 26/08/2025
1. The present petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to enroll the petitioner with the respondent University by collecting the original documents of petitioner from the respondent college;
[2025:RJ-JP:33908] (2 of 3) [CW-8150/2025] (ii) by appropriate writ order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to continue to attend the classes in the respondent College and also allow her to participate for the entire course as well as in the exam as and when the respondent University will held the exam by rectifying the mistake committed on the part of respondent College. (iii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Sequel of the contentions noted in order sheets dated 26.05.2025 and 02.07.2025, it is submitted that the petitioner, as per the merit scored by her, has claimed admission in the respective College.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the petitioner has violated the procedural conditions and without carrying out procedural formalities with respondent No.3- Chairman, Counseling Board, the petitioner approached directly respondent No.4. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already attended the classes for a period of six months, thereafter for want of procedural requirements, the respondents have not given her enrollment.
4. A query is put forth by the Court upon the counsel representing the respondent no. 4 qua availability of any vacant seat(s) with them.
5. Qua respondent No.4, it is submitted that there is a vacant seat qua the petitioner which is available. Howsoever, same can be granted upon deposition of appropriate respective fee, only.
6. In light of the said submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with the direction
[2025:RJ-JP:33908] (3 of 3) [CW-8150/2025] that enrollment be granted by the respective authorities to the petitioner, upon obtaining No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the college qua the deposition and other terms and conditions being complied with, strictly as per the governing guidelines and mandates.
7. It is also directed that in order to maintain equity and further compensate administrative lapses as already done the petitioner, a sum of Rs.10,000/- be deposited as a cost, with respondent no. 2, within a period of one month from the date of passing of this
order.
8. With aforementioned directions, the present petition stands
disposed. Parties are directed to carry out the requisites. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/159