Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34183 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
1. Heard Sri Ravi Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.54 of 2025, under Sections- 191(2), 115(2), 109 of BNS, Police Station-Jawan, District-Aligarh, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the FIR general allegation has been made against five persons. However, in the statement of injured, Ronu, allegation was made against the co- accused Ashok but the injured Lakhan has assigned general role to the four accused including the applicant. It is further submitted that injuries of Lakhan is on non-vital part. As the applicant has not assigned any specific role, therefore, he is entitled to be released on bail. It is further submitted that the co-accused Pankaj and Vishal, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9421 of 2025, vide order dated 05.04.2025. For the reasons contained in that order, the present applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 10.09.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Pandey, Suraj Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6.
Let the applicant- Deepak, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 14, 2025 S.C.
BAIL No. 34183 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad