Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200156 (ALL)

ROHAN CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22678/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22678 of 2025 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that during the course of investigation, offence underr Section 103 BNS has also been added. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact but states that he does not want to press this petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars. 4. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Certified copy of the impugned FIR be returned to counsel for the petitioner as per Rules. October 14, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivbaboo Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Rohan Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad