Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200145 (ALL)

OKESH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35380/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35380 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri R.B. Pal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri D.P.S., learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed by the applicant- Okesh with a prayer to release him on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 0066 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station- Nagla Singhi, District Firozabad. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is further submitted that motive of causing injuries to the brother of the informant is that co-accused Suraj was in relationship with the wife of elder brother of informant. Applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He also added that applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 01.07.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that specific allegation for causing grievous injuries to the injured has been made against the applicant as well as co-accused and specific role has been assigned to the present applicant. It is further submitted that the injury report of the injured shows that he received twelve injuries, out of twelve injuries, four fractures have also been found on head and nose of the injured, which substantiate the allegation of injured, therefore, he is not entitled to be released on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : R.B. Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Okesh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and taking into account the fact that specific allegation against the applicant as well as injuries received to the injured on vital part of his body, therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage. 6. Therefore, the bail application of the applicant is rejected. October 14, 2025 Vibha Singh BAIL No. 35380 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad