HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31377 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant in Court today, is taken on record. 2. Heard Mr. Harish Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 265 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(2), 109 of B.N.S., Police Station- Jasrana, District Firozabad. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that general allegation has been made against the applicant and other co-accused persons. It is further submitted that co-accused Ramji and Kayam Singh who have already been enlarged on bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32019 of 2025 vide order dated 18.09.2025 and Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.31956 of 2025 vide order dated 24.09.2025 respectively which is annexed at pages 22 and 24 of the supplementary affidavit filed today. Therefore, he is seeking parity of the orders aforesaid. It is further submitted that for the same incident applicant has also lodged an FIR against the first informant as three persons in the applicant's side were also injured, therefore, it cannot be determined who were the aggressor. He also added that the applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 12.08.2025. The charge sheet has already been submitted by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation, therefore, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and co-accused Ramji and Kayam Singh who have Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanju @ Sanjeev .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.32019 of 2025 vide order dated 18.09.2025 and Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.31956 of 2025 vide order dated 24.09.2025 respectively which is annexed at pages 22 and 24 of the supplementary affidavit filed today and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7. Let the applicant- Sanju @ Sanjeev involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 14, 2025 Imtiyaz BAIL No. 31377 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad