HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15167 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Babu Ram Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was appointed as Safai Karamchari on 31.01.2009, however, by virtue of the order impugned dated 13.06.2025, he has been transferred from Gram Panchayat- Bhadari, Block- Pratappur to Gram Panchayat-Mailaha, Block Bahariya which is 55 Kms. and he has been relieved on 24.09.2025. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the said transfer order cannot be sustained as the writ petitioner was Class-IV employee and it was virtually become impossible to work at place which is 55 Kms. He submits that the writ petitioner would file representation before the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Prayagraj. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the third respondent to consider his claim. 4. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs examination at the first instance by the third respondent. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babu Ram Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) attested copy of the writ petition before the third respondent who shall on the receipt of the same by 31.10.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. However, the benefit of the order would only be available once the writ petitioner joins the institution. 7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 14, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15167 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad