Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200129 (ALL)

KHADERU PRASAD v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/35163/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35163 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent No. 2, the Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur to decide the Revision No. 1386 of 2025, computerized case no. C202505000001386 (Khaderu Prasad vs. Smt. Reeta Rai and others, under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated time period. A further prayer has been made for a direction to the concerned respondent for interim relief in the pending revision. An application for the purpose is stated to have been filed before the revisional authority. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition to point out that although several dates have been fixed but for some reason or the other, matter has been adjourned. The delay in disposal of the case is stated to be causing hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to the respondent No. 2, the Commissioner, Gorakhpur Division, Gorakhpur to conclude the proceedings at an early date. Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the respondent No. 2, the Commissioner, Gorakhpur Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Khaderu Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Division, Gorakhpur, would make an endeavor to conclude the proceedings of the revision, which is stated to be pending before it, preferably within a period of six months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. The concerned authority would also make an endeavour to accord consideration to the application for interim relief during pendency of the revision, and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of one month from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. October 14, 2025 Imroz WRIC No. 35163 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD IMROZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad