HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12448 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for following relief: "To direct the Court below i.e. Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaunpur to decide the Original Suit No.388 of 2011 (Nirmala Devi and Another Versus Raj Bahadur) expeditiously as possible within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2011. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eighteen months Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Mishra, Rajeev Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pradeep Kumar Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) Raj Bahadur .....Respondent(s) from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 14, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12448 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad