Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200085 (ALL)

CHOTE SALMANI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/35832/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35832 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the proceeding in declaring the land surplus in Case No.411/148/81 (State Vs. Nanhe) has been abated by order dated 21.10.2019 of the competent authority. 3. After the proceeding has abated, the petitioner has submitted an application dated 11.07.2025 to the competent authority for recording the name in the revenue records but the competent authority is sitting tight over the matter in not deciding the said application of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts of the present case, the writ petition is disposed off directing the respondent No.2-Competent Authority, Urban Ceiling/Additional District Magistrate, Bareilly to consider and decide the application of the petitioner appearing at Page No.40 of the writ petition within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after hearing all the concerned parties. October 14, 2025 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddhartha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Chote Salmani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad