HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22229 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Som Veer, learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State-respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that representation has already been decided, therefore, petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 14, 2025 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Tyagi, Som Veer Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kirtika Singh, C.S.C. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Vikas Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad