Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200065 (ALL)

GHANSHYAM AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. P.W.D. U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/11354/2025 · 2025-10-08

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11354 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for payment of pension to petitioners after counting services rendered by them on work charge basis. 3. Since considering petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file fresh individual representation before opposite party no.5 i.e. Executive Engineer, Prantiya Khand, P.W.D. District Sitapur. In case such representations are filed, the same are required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation(s) of petitioner(s) along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 8, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vireandra Kumar Pandey, Prabhat Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ghanshyam And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. P.W.D. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench