SURESH @ SEENU v. The State rep by Inspector of Police
CRL OP/28408/2025 · 2025-10-27
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200059 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200059 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.28408 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.10.2025 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.28408 of 2025 Suresh @ Seenu
... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, R-6, Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.350 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.350 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnamoorthy For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.28408 of 2025 O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.09.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 309(4), 311, 125(b), 324(2) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.350 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner robbed a sum of Rs.2,000/- at knife point from the de facto complainant. Hence, the case.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only because of his involvement in some previous cases. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.09.2025 and therefore prayed for grant of bail.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the grant of bail, reiterating the prosecution case, and submitted that the petitioner has eight previous criminal cases of a similar nature. He further submitted that the investigation is still pending. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.28408 of 2025
5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the gravity of the offences and bad antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 27.10.2025 cda To
1.The Inspector of Police, R-6, Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.28408 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. cda Crl.O.P.No.28408 of 2025 27.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis