KAISHAR JAHAN v. SRI RANJAN VERMA, TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL MILKIPUR, AYDOHYA
CAPL/2900/2025 · 2025-10-08
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2900 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Shri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for applicant has put in appearance on behalf of respondent and has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court, the mutation case has been decided by order dated 06.10.2025, a copy of which has been provided during the course of argument, which is taken on record.
3. Learned counsels for the applicant are neither present nor any request has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the case.
4. As such, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged. October 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Dhar Dubey, Roshani Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari (Manish Kumar,J.) Kaishar Jahan .....Applicant(s) Sri Ranjan Verma, Tahsildar, Tahsil Milkipur, Aydohya .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench