Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200038 (ALL)

PRADIP KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8838/2025 · 2025-10-08

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8838 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. . 1. Heard Sri Virendra Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. In view of proposed order, notice to opposite party no.5 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned FIR No. 0101/2025, under sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS & 3(1) (द), 3(1) (घ), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act at Police Station Piparpur, District Amethi. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondents-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Singh Yadav, Piyush Pathak, Vinay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pradip Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, it is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 28.10.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. October 8, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 8838 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench