LAXMI NARAYAN SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/788/2023 · 2025-10-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 200032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 788 of 2023 Court No. - 92 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
1. Learned counsel for revisionists, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and learned AGA are present.
2. Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that the compromise has been taken place between the parties as the revisionists have paid entire due amount to the opposite party No.2/complainant. Therefore, the matter may kindly be decided on the basis of compromise.
3. Learned counsel for the complainant has also stated that the revisionists have paid entire amount to the complainant and now there is no dispute with regard to amount in question.
4. In view of above, both the parties are directed to file a joint affidavit, mentioning the above facts within two weeks.
5. List on 10.11.2025 in top ten cases. October 13, 2025 Md Faisal Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ashvni Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ramanuj Tripathi (Chawan Prakash,J.) Laxmi Narayan Sharma And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad