Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200031 (MAD)

JALAL v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/40470/2025 · 2025-10-29

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.40470 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 29.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.40470 of 2025 Jalal .... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Ranipet District Collectorate Ranipet District. 2.The District Revenue Officer Ranipet District Ranipet District Collectorate, Ranipet. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Arakonnam Ranipet District. 4.Rajendran 5.Aruldassan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider and pass orders in the petitioner's appeal dated 02.11.2024 made against the proceedings of the third respondent dated 24.09.2024 in Mu.Mu.P2/1977/2024 on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Kowser Nissar 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40470 of 2025 For Respondents : Mr.P.Ganesan Government Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 02.11.2024 and pass orders within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.I.Kowser Nissar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.Ganesan, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the subject property belonged to the petitioner's grandfather. He died on 03.10.1965 leaving behind six legal heirs. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the patta was issued in the name of fourth and fifth respondents who did not have any title over the property. Hence, the petitioner submitted a representation to the third respondent to rectify the error. However, the third respondent rejected the application vide proceedings dated 24.09.2024. Aggrieved by the order passed by the third respondent, an appeal was filed before the first respondent on 02.11.2024 and the same has been forwarded to the second respondent. The second respondent through proceedings dated 21.11.2024 had called upon the third respondent to submit all 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40470 of 2025 records pertaining to the petitioner's case. Thereafter, the appeal was not taken up for hearing by the second respondent and it is under these circumstances, the present writ petition has been filed. 4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to deal with the appeal filed by the petitioner on 02.11.2024 on its own merits and in accordance with law, after affording opportunity to respondents 4 and 5, and pass final orders within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 29.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral citation : Yes/No ds 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.40470 of 2025 N. ANAND VENKATESH., J ds To: 1.The District Collector Ranipet District Collectorate Ranipet District. 2.The District Revenue Officer Ranipet District Ranipet District Collectorate, Ranipet. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Arakonnam Ranipet District. W.P.No.40470 of 2025 29.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis