IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (107-2) RSA-2395-2002 (O&M) Date of decision:- 02.04.2025 Ravel Singh and others ...Appellants Versus Kehar Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- None. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. As per office report, appellants No.2 to 4 and 5(a) have expired. Appellant No.1 has been duly served and appellants No. 5 (b) to (d) are residing abroad, however, they are unrepresented. 2. It seems that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal. 3. Dismissed in default for want of prosecution. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 02.04.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.04.02 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.