Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 200009 (MAD)

P.WASEEM AKRAM, v. THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN

WP/18943/2024 · 2025-11-24

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.18943 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.11.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P.No. 18943 of 202 4 P.Waseem Akram ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Ombudsman, Fourth Floor, SIDCO Corporate office Buildings, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Tiruppathur Electricity Distribution Circle, No.07, Balammal Colony, Tiruppathur – 635 601. 3.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Alangayam Road, Perumalpet, Vaniyambadi – 635 752, Thiruppathur District. Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18943 of 2024 4.The Designated Engineer, AE / O & M / Udeyendram, TANGEDCO, Thimmampettai Road – Jafarabad, Vaniyambadi – 635 754, Tiruppathur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the record pertaining to the order dated 07.05.2024 passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Lr.No.TNEO / F Omb – Gen – C No.197/D No.650/2024 returning the appeal filed by the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to effect electricity connection forthwith to the petitioner’s house comprised at Plot No.56, Survey No.22/2, Abdul Salam Nagar, Jafarabad Village, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Tiruppathur District. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Ram Prasath For Respondents : Mr.S.Madhusudanan ***** ORDER Page No.2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18943 of 2024 When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach the Waqf Tribunal for appropriate remedy. An Endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition today. 2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. 24.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No sp To Page No.3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18943 of 2024 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Ombudsman, Fourth Floor, SIDCO Corporate office Buildings, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 2.The Superintending Engineer, Tiruppathur Electricity Distribution Circle, No.07, Balammal Colony, Tiruppathur – 635 601. 3.The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Alangayam Road, Perumalpet, Vaniyambadi – 635 752, Thiruppathur District. 4.The Designated Engineer, AE / O & M / Udeyendram, TANGEDCO, Thimmampettai Road – Jafarabad, Vaniyambadi – 635 754, Tiruppathur District. Page No.4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18943 of 2024 M.DHANDAPANI, J. sp W.P.No. 18943 of 2024 Page No.5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18943 of 2024 24.11 .2025 Page No.6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis