Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 20000 (AP)

Shaik Nagul Meera, v. Patan Immam Khan,

CRP/1332/2025 · 2025-09-11

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010280602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1332/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK NAGUL MEERA,, S/O.KHASIM @ MARKAR KHASIM @ DODLARU KHASIM, AGE 57 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 12-772/2, MASJEED BAZAAR, MADDI NAGAR, CHILAKALURIPET TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. PATAN IMMAM KHAN, S/O. KASIM KHAN, AGE 67 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 12-1043, MADDI NAGAR, CHILAKALURIPET TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT 2. SHAIK IBRAHIM, S/O JOHN MUSLIM AGE 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 12-1043, MADDI NAGAR, CHILAKALURIPET TOWN, PALNADU DISTRIC ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThis civil revision petition preferred aggrieved by the Order dated 09-04- 2025 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narasaraopet, Palnadu District in I.A. No. 304/2024 in IP No. 26/2024 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant protection order against the arrest warrant issued in EP No. 47/2024 in OS No. 106 of 2011 on the file of PrI. Junior Civil Judge, Chilakaluripet, Palnadu District pending disposal of the revision petition and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1332 of 2025 ORDER: Mr. T. Ramakoteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further adjudication is required in the present revision petition. 2. The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date:12.09.2025 SCS 4 126 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1332 of 2025 Dt.12.09.2025 SCS