IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12941 of 2025 Priyanka Sahoo & anr. …. Petitioners Ms. Srijee Chimanka, Advocate being authorized by Mr. Kousik Anand Guru, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER Order No. 16.03.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “It is, there for prayed that, the Hon'ble Court be graciously please to ISSUE RULE NISI calling upon the opposite party as why writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ/writs or order/orders and/or direction to the Opp. Parties No.2 to 6, consider this representation and to appointment to the petitioner, the land oustee under the Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme as prepared by them in the year 1991. If the Opposite Parties fails to show cause or shows inadequate or false cause, make the aforesaid rule nisi absolute. And/or order/orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in order to provide the Petitioner Complete Relief. And for their act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound, remain ever pray.” p. 2 3. Ms. Srijee Chimanka, being authorized by Mr. K.A. Guru, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition seeking liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars, more particularly, explaining the delay in filing the writ petition. 4. She also files a memo signed by Mr. Guru, learned counsel for the Petitioners in support of her submission. Memo so filed in the Court is taken on record. 5. In view of the Memo filed, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within a period of one month hence. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (S.K. Mishra) Judge Kanhu Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.