RAHUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/4644/2024 · 2025-10-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4644 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Rajiv Raman Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.55 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Ramur Kala, District Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant and subsequently she was killed on account of demand of dowry. It is argued that the co accused Anamika alias Bitta and Maya Devi were enlarged on bail vide orders dated 15.4.2024 and 16.4.2024 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 4129 of 2024 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 4179 of 2024 respectively. The post mortem report on record indicates that the cause of death could not be ascertained.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 23.3.2024 and have no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Rahul be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey, Rajiv Raman Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shyamendra Singh, Tej Singh Rahul .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 4644 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench