Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199983 (ALL)

RAVI SHANKAR DWIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/3887/2025 · 2025-10-08

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 3887 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shankar Lal Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no. 9. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):- "i) To, issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2/District Magistrate, Amethi to take necessary action against the erring officers / Respondent No. 3 to 6 who have illegally demolished the wall of Petitioner with the connivance of respondent no. 7 to 20, showing the false order of this Hon'ble Court; ii) To, issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent No. 4 to 6, not to create any hindrance in the peaceful possession of the house of Petitioner." 3. Upon perusal of the documents, it transpires that there is a property dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents. There is also a dispute with regard to the demarcated portion of the petitioner's property. The petitioner has alleged in the writ petition that the private respondents in connivance with the authorities have demolished the wall of the petitioner pursuant to illegally obtaining an order in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 43 of 2025. 4. Without entering into merit of the case, we are of the view that this issue is required to be thrashed out by the petitioner and the private respondents in the trial court or in the revenue court, whichever has jurisdiction. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Adarsh Tripathi, Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Pradeep Kumar, Pramod Kumar Yadav, Shankar Lal Pandey Ravi Shankar Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum and make appropriate application(s) in accordance with law. October 8, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 3887 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench