BITTO v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAILC/111/2025 · 2025-10-08
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 111 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present application for cancellation of bail, with liberty to file an appropriate application for the same relief before the learned Sessions Judge, Lucknow.
3. In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the learned Sessions Judge, Lucknow. It is further provided that if an application for cancellation of bail is filed before the learned court below within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a further period of two months. October 8, 2025 R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Faizan Ali, Shamshad Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Bitto .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Affairs Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench