Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199969 (ALL)

RAM NARESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/9338/2025 · 2025-10-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9338 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Short counter affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Ramesh Gupta, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.270 of 2025, under Section 137(2), 127(2), 65(1), 351(3) of BNS & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Gauriganj, District Amethi. 4. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that daughter of the informant was wronged by the applicant. It was stated that she was aged about 13 years. The statements under Section 180 & 183 BNSS supported the FIR version. The victim refused to undergo medical examination as is evident from the records. 5. Today, a short counter affidavit has been filed by the complainant stating that the FIR in question was lodged at the instance of the neighbours and the incident is not correct. 6. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 7. In view of the victim's refusal to undergo medical examination and the affidavit filed today, the applicant who is in custody since 06.08.2025 and has no criminal antecedent is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Naresh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) the application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Ram Naresh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9338 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench