Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199964 (ALL)

DHAVAL VIJAY MEHTA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1397/2025 · 2025-10-08

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1397 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Shri Sridhar Awasthi, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant and the instructions filed by learned A.G.A for the State are taken on record. 3. Heard Shri Harsh Ram Chandani, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Sridhar Awasthi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A for the State. 4. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the F.I.R has been registered and the said dispute is a matrimonial discord between the parties. The offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant is punishable upto a maximum period of seven years and according to the instructions of the learned A.G.A for the State, the applicant will not be arrested if he appears upon the service of notice. Statement, if any, shall be recorded and further proceedings of investigation will be carried out. 5. In view of the written instructions as well as the statement of the learned A.G.A, since there is no apprehension of arrest, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of. October 8, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ripu Daman Shahi, Harsh Vardhan Shahi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sridhar Awasthi (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Dhaval Vijay Mehta And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench