Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199961 (ALL)

DHIRENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. ARBITRATOR/DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/9270/2025 · 2025-10-08

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9270 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Deep Narayan Tripathi, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Shri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners have challenged the validity of an order dated 06.09.2025 passed by the Arbitrator/ Collector, Ayodhya in Case No.2765 of 2024 under Section 3(G)(5) of the National Highways Act 1956. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have raised a preliminary objection that the order impugned in the writ petition is an arbitration award which can only be challenged by way of an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. 4. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant writ petition and he will challenged the award in accordance with the law before the appropriate Court. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed has not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 8, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akash Deep, Deep Narayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Dhirendra Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Arbitrator/District Magistrate,Ayodhya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench