IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 796 of 2025 Date of Decision: 31.07.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Urmila Devi & Ors. ……...Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kumar & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Parkash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 30.07.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 26.07.2025 passed by Deputy Director of Elementary Education, District Sirmaur at Nahan, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication as well as order dated 26.07.2025 vis-a-vis mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, this Court is persuaded to agree with the contention of learned Additional Advocate General. Since there was only direction to consider and decide the representation of the 2 petitioner and respondents, after having considered the representation, have rejected the same, no action of the respondents can be said to be contumacious. 3. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of judgment, alleged to have been violated, if so advised. July 31, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge