SUDHANSHU KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/12759/2022 · 2025-03-19
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19996 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19996 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42104 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12759 of 2022 Petitioner :- Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amrish Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Shashi Prakash Rai Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus direct to the respondent authority to take the action in pursuance of inquiry report dated 25.01.2018."
3. The petitioner is complainant and he is not aggrieved by the impugned order as none of the rights of the petitioner is prejudiced by the impugned order.
4. In such view of the fact, the petitioner has no locus standi to file the present writ petition.
5. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Mohit Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad