Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199952 (ALL)

MADAN MOHAN GAUTAM v. SRI SHASHANK TRIPATHI DISTT. MAGISTRATE DISTT. BARABANKI AND 2 OTHERS

CAPL/2464/2025 · 2025-10-08

Manish Kumar

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2464 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned Standing Counsel has filed compliance affidavit on behalf of respondent no.2, which is taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 01.04.2025, a decision dated 27.08.2025 has been taken on the representation of the applicant. Copy of which has been enclosed as C.A.-1 to the compliance affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the decision has not been taken on the correct facts and his lawful claim has wrongly been denied for payment of subsistence allowance otherwise for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous as there was only a direction to take decision on the representation of the applicant. It is further submitted that application may be given liberty to challenge the decision dated 27.08.2025 by filing writ petition before this Court. As prayed, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy, as may be permissible under law. October 8, 2025 Ashish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Madan Mohan Gautam .....Applicant(s) Sri Shashank Tripathi Distt. Magistrate Distt. Barabanki And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench