FAKIRSHAH MEHBOOB SHAH v. ISTIYAKSHAH RAZZAK SHAH AND ANOTHER
CA/6368/2025 · 2025-08-26
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19994 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19994 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6368 OF 2025 IN CRAST/17165/2025 FAKIRSHAH MEHBOOB SHAH VERSUS ISTIYAKSHAH RAZZAK SHAH AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Imale Ramesh Ramdas. ...
CORAM :
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 26.08.2025 PER COURT
:-
1. Though respondents are served, they have not caused appearance. None appears on their behalf today.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, it is desirable to condone the delay. There are no malafides on the part of the applicant. Averments of the application are uncontroverted.
3. Civil application for delay is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “B” and “C”.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ... vmk/-