HARI OM TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPTT. LKO
BAIL/3974/2025 · 2025-10-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199938 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199938 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3974 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 433 of 2024, under Sections 85 BNS, 80(2) BNS and under Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Gazipur, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the father in law and the mother in law are enlarged on bail vide orders dated 21.1.2025 and 21.1.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No.588 of 2025 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 426 of 2025. The applicant is the husband and the cause of death is ante mortem hanging.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the postmortem report indicate the cause of death as ante mortem hanging, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 7.10.2024 and have no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Hari Om Tiwari be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar Rai, Ajai Kumar, Avaneesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hari Om Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 3974 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench