MUID AHAMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/9567/2025 · 2025-10-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199928 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199928 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9567 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list of fresh cases.
2. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition nor any request for passing over or adjournment has been made.
3. Heard Sri Devendra Mohan Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
4. By means of the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dated 15.09.2025, passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Shahabad, District Hardoi, whereby the fair price shop license of the petitioner has been suspended and an enquiry was instituted against him.
5. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf the State has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has got an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 13(3) of U.P. Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in view of availability of alternative remedy. In case the petitioner avails alternative remedy of filing an appeal, his appeal shall be decided in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Yadav, Satish Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Muid Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supplies U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
accordance with law expeditiously without being affected by dismissal of this writ petition. October 8, 2025 Ram.
WRIC No. 9567 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench