HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8830 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Heard Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the F.I.R dated 03.09.2025 vide case crime no.542 of 2025 under Sections 191 (1), 191(2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109, 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S, 2023 at Police Station Bangarmau, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has wrongly and falsely been implicated in the impugned F.I.R and except instigation, no role has been assigned to the petitioner.Thus, the impugned F.I.R is not tenable against the petitioner. 4. Learned A.G.A vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that the main role of instigation is on petitioner, on the employees of the Dhaba of the petitioner had assaulted. There are injuries also and whether there is involvement of the petitioner is a part of investigation, therefore no case for interference is made out. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of record as well as contents of the F.I.R., the commission of offence cannot be ruled out. Thus, no case for interference is made out in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of State of Telangan vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani; (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors; (2021) SCC Online SC 315. 6. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed. October 8, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Shanu Sheikh @ Sanu Sheikh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench