AAKASH VERMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/4847/2025 · 2025-10-08
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4847 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2, and Ms. Rifat Naz holding brief of Sri Shobhit Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 03.03.2025 bearing no.0080, under Sections 498- A, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended in 2015 lodged at Police Station Gazipur, District Lucknow.
3. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioners and respondent no.3 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 02.05.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition.
4. This Court vide order dated 30.05.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise.
5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 30.05.2025 the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 18.06.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioners and respondent no.3.
6. As per the said compromise, the petitioners and respondent no.3 have Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Singh, Aditya Kumar Pandey, Saurabh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Shobhit Singh Aakash Verma And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
agreed to end the dispute amongst themselves amicably.
7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings of FIR No.0080, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended in 2015 lodged at Police Station Gazipur, District Lucknow, are quashed. October 8, 2025 A. Katiyar CRLP No. 4847 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench