KSHITIZ YADAV v. UDAI RAJ SINGH COMMISSIONER NAGAR NIGAM LUCKNOW and ORS
CAPL/123/2017 · 2025-10-08
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 123 of 2017 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Neither the learned counsel for applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
3. The contempt application is dismissed in default.
4. Notice, if any, issued to the respondent, stands discharged. October 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naqibullah Khan, Qamar Ahmad, Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Kshitiz Yadav .....Applicant(s) Udai Raj Singh Commissioner Nagar Nigam Lucknow And Ors .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench