Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199895 (ALL)

SAJAG SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECRETARIAT LKO.

BAIL/1512/2025 · 2025-10-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1512 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.489 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80 of BNS and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Lalganj, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused Sandeep Srivastava and Smt Kusum Srivastava were enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 16.1.2025 and 20.12.2024 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 372 of 2025 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 13176 of 2024 respectively. The applicant is the husband. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the postmortem report and the fact that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Sajag Srivastava be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Gupta, Babu Ram Shukla, Satyendra Nath Verma, Vinay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sajag Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secretariat Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 1512 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench